About us.Home.Archive.Contact Us.Site Map.

Canada and the World

        Current Events with a Canadian Perspective

 

Last update

19 November 2010

Site map

No Security Council Seat for Canada

 

About every ten years Canada is given a

Seat on the UN’s top body, but not this time

 

The Security Council of the United Nations (below) is the  

Scott Garner

 

where major decisions of peace and war are taken. It has five permanent members – China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

 

There are ten non-permanent members who are elected to serve two-year terms by all the members of the United Nations. These non-permanent seats are divided up on a roughly geographic basis so that all regions of the world are represented.

 

The former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Sichan Siv told The Globe and Mail (October 11, 2010) that “The non-permanent seats on the Security Council are probably the most coveted seats among all the UN positions.”

 

Canada Wins Seat Once a Decade

CBC News reports (October 12, 2010) “Canada has been on the Security Council six times, roughly once a decade, since the 1940s. The country’s last term ended in 2000.”

 

To win a seat countries campaign just as candidates do in an election. Ambassadors and high-level diplomats talk to their counterparts and try to sell the advantage of having this or that country on the Security Council. Ambassador Siv says countries trade votes in order to win a seat.

 

According to the CBC, Canada has been campaigning for nine years and “In the final days of Tuesday’s bid, Canada wined and dined diplomats, offering them gifts of Canadian beer and maple syrup.”

 

Every time in the past that Canada has put its name forward as a candidate for the Security Council it has won. But, in 2010, the vote went badly for Canada, which was competing with Germany and Portugal for one of two seats available for its geographic grouping.

 

On a second ballot Canada got 78 votes to Portugal’s 113; Germany won a seat in the first ballot with more than the required two-thirds of the 192 votes.

 

With its poor showing in the second ballot, Canada withdrew its candidacy.

 

Canada’s Changed Foreign Policy

The Calgary Herald (October 12, 2010) quotes former Canadian Ambassador to the UN Paul Heinbecker as saying “It’s a significant defeat.”

 

The Herald says “Heinbecker and other critics say the Harper government’s foreign policy has meant it has alienated many potential supporters of Canada, especially among Arab, Muslim, and African nations. He said Canada’s weak climate change policy had alienated European and small island nations…“

 

Canada has been cast as a villain in the climate change drama. The Climate Change Performance Index ranks the country as 59th among the world’s 60 richest countries in terms of its efforts to combat global warming. This cost it the votes of small island nations that will disappear under the waves as the ocean levels rise due to melting ice caps.

 

Globe and Mail letter writer Bryson Brown (October 14, 2010) points out that Canada’s unquestioning support of Israel, including that country’s “disregard for civilian lives in recent military actions...has damaged our reputation for even-handedness in the Middle East.” There goes the support of Arab nations.

 

Doctoral thesis candidate Dan Herman at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, Waterloo writes (Kitchener-Waterloo Record, October 14, 2010): “As for international development assistance, in 2009, Canadian taxpayers contributed close to $5 billion toward international assistance programs; a generous sum. However, in relative terms, Canada’s foreign-aid spending amounts to just 0.3 percent of gross national income, placing it amongst the bottom half of OECD donors, behind 13 more generous, though not more prosperous, European countries.” African nations noted this and placed their votes elsewhere.

 

Many have also suggested that by withdrawing from peacekeeping in favour of a more aggressive military role Canada has seen its support slide.

 

Sources

“Cannon Blames Ignatieff for Canada Losing UN Vote.“ CBC News, October 12, 2010.

“UN Security Council: How to Join the World`s most Exclusive Club.“ Siri Agrell, Globe and Mail, October 11, 2010.

“Canada Quits Race for UN Security Council Seat.“ Steven Edwards, Postmedia News, October 12, 2010.

“Let’s Learn from UN Snub.” Dan Herman, KW Record, October 14, 2010.

 

© Canada and the World, October 2010

All rights reserved

VOX POPULI

 

A few comments made by citizens gleaned from Canadian news websites in the aftermath of the UN vote.

 

“There are dire politics in this world organization played by dictatorship countries for the benefit of themselves and not for the good of the world.”

Calgary Herald

 

“UN members are right to reject the candidacy of a government that obstructs international action on global warming, that acts as a shill for Israel's illegal occupation and settlement activities, and that has abandoned whatever slight independence Canada previously showed in its foreign policy vis-a-vis Washington.

CBC News

 

“Our current government has hardly made us look like fools on the world stage. Despite some of the local gaffes Canada has stood strong on the international front.”

CTV News

 

“This is a defeat for Canada and a clear message our ‘independent’ foreign policy is seen as tied too close to the U.S. and the U.K. Pure and simple. Message to Harper: you are not George Bush north.”

Montreal Gazette

“Who cares about the UN? They are mostly a bunch of freeloaders from nations with little credibility.”

CBC News

 

“Canada’s loss of a United Nations Security Council seat is a humiliation to our country and sign of the great damage Mr. Harper has inflicted on this nation.”

Globe and Mail

 

Canada’s Foreign Policy

Gets a Harder Edge

 

The United Nations currently has about 100,000 people deployed on peacekeeping missions around the world.

 

Canada’s contribution to this is 64 military personnel and 157 police officers.

 

“The loss of the [Security Council] seat doesn’t matter very much. What does matter is that [Prime Minister Stephen] Harper and his foreign minister were so out of touch. So oblivious to the feelings and concerns of other UN members that they didn’t have a clue what was going on. It’s a sad comedown for a country that once was seen as a leader at the United Nations.”

Geoffrey Stevens, Kitchener-Waterloo Record, October 18, 2010.