Canada and the World

        Current Events with a Canadian Perspective

 

Last update

19 November 2010

Site map

Poor Achievement

Linked to Poverty

 

A study at Cornell University has found

there is a biological reason why people

born into poverty usually stay poor

 

“Family income is a strong and consistent predictor of multiple indices of achievement, including standardized test scores, grades in school, and educational attainment.” So say Gary W. Evans and Michelle A. Schamberg with the Departments of Design and Environmental Analysis and Human Development, at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

 

The result of research they carried out was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in February 2009.

 

Poverty Reduces Memory Capacity

Evans and Schamberg studied 195 white young people, equally divided between male and female. Half the group was raised in poverty, while the other half came from families with average American incomes.

 

Reporting on the study in The Globe and Mail  (April 10, 2009) Marina Jimenez wrote: “Those who grew up in poor families could hold an average of 8.5 items, such as telephone numbers, in their memory, compared with 9.4 for those from middle-class backgrounds.” This is a 20% difference.

 

As Professor Evans points out, “This means poor children cannot learn as well as those from middle-class families.”

 

Stress Damages Brain Development

The researchers measured the amount of stress encountered by the young people from both groups. They measured this by looking at concentrations of three stress-related hormones, body-mass index, and allostatic load. (Allostatic load is the physiological wear and tear on the body that results from having to cope with stress).

 

The researchers discovered that the stress load was higher among the youth who came from households living below the poverty line. Middle-class kids had a lower stress load. Stress is known to have a negative impact on the pre-frontal cortex and the hippocampus – two areas of the brain that are associated with working memory.

 

Poor Living Conditions

Professor Evans had previously studied the social conditions of the poor in 2004. He published the results of his work in the February-March 2004 issue of American Psychologist.

 

He found that poor people live in less desirable neighbourhoods. The children of poor families are therefore more likely to be exposed to the social ills that accompany poverty, such as crime, crowded living conditions, and violence. They are also more likely to be exposed to noise and smoking.

 

Added to this, Prof. Evans reported that “Poor children experience less social support, and their parents are less responsive and more authoritarian.

 

“Low-income children are read to relatively infrequently, watch more TV, and have less access to books and computers. Low-income parents are less involved in their children’s school activities. The air and water poor children consume are more polluted.”

 

All these things add to the stress load that youngsters experience. And, that stress is now established to have a negative impact on learning outcomes, condemning people from poor backgrounds to lower-income work.

 

As Gary W. Evans and Michelle A. Schamberg have shown in their research, there is a biological basis to poverty.

 

Image credit

Jim Fischer

 

Sources

“Childhood Poverty, Chronic Stress, and Adult Working Memory.” Gary W. Evans and Michelle A. Schamberg, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, February 24, 2009.

“Poverty May Affect Memory, Maria Jimenez, Globe and Mail, April 10, 2009.

“The Environment of Childhood Poverty.” Gary W. Evans,  American Psychologist, February-March 2004.

“Rich Nation, Poor Children.” Vipal Jain, The Toronto Star, November 20, 2009.

 

© Canada and the World, September 2010

All rights reserved

 

“An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics.”

Plutarch (46-120 CE)

Campaign to End

Child Poverty in Canada

 

In 1994, “the Canadian government resolved to eliminate child poverty by the year 2000...The rate of child poverty has remained at 12 percent for two decades now, according to Statistics Canada.”

Toronto Star, November 2009